Word of mouth: How our tongue shapes our preferences, and why you should eat popcorn in the cinema
Topolinski, S. (2012). The sensorimotor contributions to implicit memory, familiarity, and recollection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141 (2), 260-281.
Topolinski, S., Likowski, K. U., Weyers, P., & Strack, F. (2009). The face of fluency: Semantic coherence automatically elicits a specific pattern of facial muscle reactions. Cognition and Emotion, 23 (2), 260-271.
Topolinski, S., Lindner, S., & Freudenberg, A. (2014). Popcorn in the cinema: Oral interference sabotages advertising effects. In press, Journal of Consumer Psychology.
Topolinski, S., & Reber, R. (2010). Gaining insight into the „Aha“- experience. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(6), 402-405.
Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2009a). The architecture of intuition: Fluency and affect determine intuitive judgments of semantic and visual coherence, and of grammaticality in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138 (1), 39-63.
Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2009b). Motormouth: Mere exposure depends on stimulus-specific motor simulations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35 (2), 423-33.
Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2010). False fame prevented - avoiding fluency-effects without judgmental correction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(5), 721-733.
Topolinski, S., & Türk Pereira, P. (2012). Mapping the tip of the tongue - Deprivation, sensory sensitization, and oral haptics. Perception, 41(1), 71-92.
Tucker, M., & Ellis, R. (1998). On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human perception and performance, 24, 3, 830–846.
Acknowledgments
The original research reviewed here was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) (Str264/26-1, TO 705/1-1). I thank Fritz Strack for those happy years of joint work.